| Category | Points | Description | Peer Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Five tasks over 12 weeks | 5 | List five things completed, including issues addressed, burndown tracking, and presentation work. | 4.7 |
| Full Stack Project Demo | 2 | Demonstrate the project, highlight CPT requirements, and incorporate N@TM feedback. | 1.8 |
| Project Feature Blog Write-up | 1 | Use CPT/FRQ language to write a structured blog post on project features. | 0.9 |
| MCQ Completion | 1 | Successfully complete and reflect on multiple-choice questions. | 1 |
| Retrospective Reflection | 1 | - Reflect on strengths and weaknesses - Create next steps plans for improvement - Engage with peer projects and document interests - Think about future steps in CompSci, classes, college, internships, or career - Help a new peer with final exam prep or conduct a live review with Ms. Pataki - Send a detailed summary of review points 24 hours in advance, including a self-grade assessment |
0.9 |
| Total | 10 | Maximum possible score. | 9.3 |
- Don’t rush through the review, take the time to go through important parts
- Don’t focus on small aspects of the retrospective, just summarize each part
- Take in a calm and confident voice
- Don’t skim through each blog of the retrospective